|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
Published articlesSalvador Dalí and Science Carme Ruiz Newspaper El Punt, October 18, 2000 Following the most interesting recent talk on “The Origins of Life” by Doctor Joan Oró at Alt Empordà District Council, I would like to remind us all – as that eminent scientist did – of Salvador Dalí’s relationship with science.
In 1940 he began to take an interest in Planck’s quantum theory. It was in that year that he painted the work Slave Market with Voltaire’s Face Appearing.. In 1945 the Hiroshima atomic bomb made such an impression on Salvador Dalí that the nuclear or atomic period of his work began Melancholic Atomic and Uraniumist Idyll, 1945. Other works from this period are: Feather Equilibrium, 1947; Dematerialisation of Nero’s Nose, 1947 and The Three Sphinxes of Bikini, 1947.
In 1949 he avidly studied the treatise Divina proportione by Luca Pacioli. That was the year he painted Leda atomica, a work calling for great mathematical elaboration and one to which he devoted many hours of analysis and study.
In the 1950s, he began “corpuscular” painting, influenced by atomic theories, and this was to lead on to nuclear mysticism. Dalí explained his elements in a tour of the United States. In 1954 he painted the work Rhinocerotic Figure of Ilissos of Phidias, in which his obsession with the rhinoceros’s horn (constructed according to a perfect logarithmic spiral) was already manifest. In 1958, in the catalogue for the exhibition at the Carstairs Gallery in New York, Salvador Dalí wrote the article “Anti-material Manifesto” in which he declared: “I am studying; I want to find the way to transport my works into anti-matter. That would involve application of a new equation formulated by Doctor Werner Heisenberg (...) That is why I, who previously only admired Dalí, will now start to admire that Heisenberg who resembles me”. Works from this period include: The Madonna of Portlligat, 1950; Lapis Lazuline Corpuscular Assumpta, 1952; Galatea of the Spheres, 1952; Corpus Hypercubus, 1954; Portrait of Gala with Rhinocerotic Symptoms, 1954; Saint Surrounded by Three Pi-Mesons, 1956; Living Still Life, 1956, etc.
But it was during the period 1962-1978 that we can state with assurance that his work was truly influenced by the impact of science. The first part focussed above all on genetics, and more specifically on DNA and its structure. We have an example in the work Galacidalacidesoxyribonucleicacid dating from 1963. In 1965 his interest in holography and three-dimensional art began to be awakened. Over the course of the decade he continued to study the latter aspect and the work of Gerard Dou, in whose canvases he discovered dual images, that is, stereoscopic images. >From that time, 1970, he began to work with a Fresnel lens in order to put together these images. In 1971, when Denis Gabor was awarded the Nobel Prize for his work on lasers, Salvador Dalí interested himself in holography and in 1972 staged his first hologram exhibition at the prestigious Knoedler Gallery in New York, where the hologram Holos! Holos! Velázquez! Gabor! was presented (this hologram was also presented at the Theatre-Museum).
From the 1970s we might highlight the following works, all of them stereoscopic: Dalí from the Back Painting Gala from the Back Eternalised by Six Virtual Corneas Provisionally Reflected in Six Real Mirrors, 1972-73; Dalí Lifting the Skin of the Mediterranean to show Gala the Birth of Venus, 1977; Dali’s Hand Drawing Back a Golden Fleece to Show Gala the Naked Dawn Very, Very Far Away Behind the Sun, 1977. We also have The Harmony of the Spheres, a stereoscopic work in a single element, and In Search of the Fourth Dimension, 1979.
In the 1980s and through to the end of his life, Salvador Dalí centred his attention on the catastrophe theory of the mathematician René Thom, as exemplified in works from that period such as: Treaty on Catastropheiform Writing, 1982, consisting of 29 handwritten pages; The Topological Seizing of Europe. Homage to René Thom, 1983.
To conclude, we might note the symposium which, under the title “Culture and Science: determinism and freedom” was held at the Dalí Theatre-Museum in 1985, organised by the Faculty of Physics of the University of Barcelona. The symposium revolved around six main lectures on the role of chance in science, given by specialists in the fields of physics, mathematics, astrophysics and chemistry. The discussion sessions, preceded by the lectures, were chaired by Jordi Wagensberg, director of the Science Museum in Barcelona. Dalí followed the seminars with interest using video equipment set up in his room at Torre Galatea, as Lluís Racionero noted at the time in the Avui daily newspaper: “Dalí recommended that Thom and Prigogine made peace with each other, thereby showing that he had been following the debates attentively...” At a time when the most important thing in the world of science was specialisation, Dalí was already advocating a stance which is today a most important subject of debate: unity. We find this in his declarations upon being made foreign associate member of the Académie des Beaux-Arts of the Institut de France. He gave an address called “Gala, Velásquez and the Fleece of Gold”, in which he spoke of DNA, Heisenberg, Descartes and René Thom. When asked by a journalist from “Le Figaro” newspaper, “Why such a great interest in science?”, Dalí replied: “Because artists scarcely interest me at all. I believe that artists should have some notions of science in order to tread a different terrain, which is that of unity”. |
|||||
| © 2006 - Gala-Salvador Dalí Foundation - All rights reserved - Legal notice - Privacy - Copyright |